<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for </title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.danbaril.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.danbaril.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Oct 2011 10:51:40 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on RIM still doesn&#8217;t get it by danbaril</title>
		<link>http://www.danbaril.com/2011/10/19/rim-still-doesnt-get-it-2/comment-page-1/#comment-1352</link>
		<dc:creator>danbaril</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Oct 2011 10:51:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.danbaril.com/?p=1594#comment-1352</guid>
		<description>My observations/blog is not so much based on what RIM/Developers/BBX/Blackberry-Balance are doing, or ***think*** they are doing, but rather what customers of those technologies are saying with their wallets about Apple vs. Blackberry. If the justifications you point out (RIM is slow) and the promise of future products (BBX and undefined handhelds) pan out, then people can decide. I just thinks it&#039;s too little too late.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My observations/blog is not so much based on what RIM/Developers/BBX/Blackberry-Balance are doing, or ***think*** they are doing, but rather what customers of those technologies are saying with their wallets about Apple vs. Blackberry. If the justifications you point out (RIM is slow) and the promise of future products (BBX and undefined handhelds) pan out, then people can decide. I just thinks it&#8217;s too little too late.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on RIM still doesn&#8217;t get it by me</title>
		<link>http://www.danbaril.com/2011/10/19/rim-still-doesnt-get-it-2/comment-page-1/#comment-1344</link>
		<dc:creator>me</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Oct 2011 15:50:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.danbaril.com/?p=1594#comment-1344</guid>
		<description>During the keynote speech RIM showed how BBX will be easier for  developers to create cool native and cross platform apps. I guess you also haven&#039;t heard about BlackBerry Balance. It isolates corporate and personal data.

RIM has made it very easy for devs to make money and bring great apps to their new platform, BBX to the benefit of consumers over the old OS. Many bloggers wouldn&#039;t know the difference since their head isn&#039;t stuck in the sand, its up in something else!

In this post after DevCon you have nothing positive to say about Android player or any of the new and exciting developments for programmers. Just so you know many native applications can be ported over to BBX anywhere from a few minutes to a couple of hours, great for devs and great for consumers like me who typed this on a PlayBook! The future for RIM is up. Just because these are unavailable right now doesn&#039;t mean RIM doesn&#039;t get it. Blame them for being slow which is at least true!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>During the keynote speech RIM showed how BBX will be easier for  developers to create cool native and cross platform apps. I guess you also haven&#8217;t heard about BlackBerry Balance. It isolates corporate and personal data.</p>
<p>RIM has made it very easy for devs to make money and bring great apps to their new platform, BBX to the benefit of consumers over the old OS. Many bloggers wouldn&#8217;t know the difference since their head isn&#8217;t stuck in the sand, its up in something else!</p>
<p>In this post after DevCon you have nothing positive to say about Android player or any of the new and exciting developments for programmers. Just so you know many native applications can be ported over to BBX anywhere from a few minutes to a couple of hours, great for devs and great for consumers like me who typed this on a PlayBook! The future for RIM is up. Just because these are unavailable right now doesn&#8217;t mean RIM doesn&#8217;t get it. Blame them for being slow which is at least true!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on What happened to RIM by danbaril</title>
		<link>http://www.danbaril.com/2011/06/22/what-happened-to-rim/comment-page-1/#comment-1284</link>
		<dc:creator>danbaril</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jun 2011 13:33:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.danbaril.com/?p=1544#comment-1284</guid>
		<description>I agree with only part of what you said and in fact stated in my original post that RIM mustn&#039;t just be a copy-cat in the consumer space. The term you use &quot;differentiate&quot; is a good one, however, the way in which RIM currently differentiates IS the problem.

Owner/Managers who, similar to RIM, believe their employees &quot;live to work&quot; versus &quot;work to live&quot; are out-of-touch. Marketing to that differentiating mentality is what got RIM into trouble in the first place. It&#039;s okay to have product that is more business than consumer orientated up until the point where lines blur between the tools we require/desire for work versus personal activities. At that point, and as I argue in my post, a person&#039;s subconscious wants overtake any and all conscious needs and there is little one can do to fight that. At least not for any length of time.

Costs and productivity are not so much &quot;controlled&quot; by dictating what device a workforce gets to use, but rather by creating the right sticks and carrots for achieving various levels of personal and corporate success. Placing limitations on what device a workforce can use, or what functions that device is allowed to perform best is not the answer to cost and productivity control and/or objectives.

RIM must, if it is to survive, first and foremost abandon the &quot;live to work&quot; philosophy, but then as you say it must also find a way to differentiate itself in the same ubiquitous space which is now dominated by a growing Apple and Android. As a colleague pointed out to me via email following my blog post &quot;...when I see my kid’s grade 6 pals with iPhones, you know BB’s goose is cooked.&quot; 

The technology industry is cruel. Unlike politics where no matter how serious the faux-pas all can be forgiven, in the technology industry it is increasingly the case that after strike-one you&#039;re out! We have Nortel, among others, to thank for that. 

RIM&#039;s current number one asset is the degree of customer loyalty they enjoy from BB users. Job 1 for RIM is to protect that asset and by my calculation it only has between 3-6 months at most to prove in a demonstrable way that it is committed and succeeding in doing so. If it fails at even this primary task, then like my colleague said its goose will be cooked before the US Thanks Giving ... a month after iPhone 5 will be out, and I am willing to bet, within ear-shot of an iPad 3 announcement. That, my friend, is a damn tough act to compete against!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with only part of what you said and in fact stated in my original post that RIM mustn&#8217;t just be a copy-cat in the consumer space. The term you use &#8220;differentiate&#8221; is a good one, however, the way in which RIM currently differentiates IS the problem.</p>
<p>Owner/Managers who, similar to RIM, believe their employees &#8220;live to work&#8221; versus &#8220;work to live&#8221; are out-of-touch. Marketing to that differentiating mentality is what got RIM into trouble in the first place. It&#8217;s okay to have product that is more business than consumer orientated up until the point where lines blur between the tools we require/desire for work versus personal activities. At that point, and as I argue in my post, a person&#8217;s subconscious wants overtake any and all conscious needs and there is little one can do to fight that. At least not for any length of time.</p>
<p>Costs and productivity are not so much &#8220;controlled&#8221; by dictating what device a workforce gets to use, but rather by creating the right sticks and carrots for achieving various levels of personal and corporate success. Placing limitations on what device a workforce can use, or what functions that device is allowed to perform best is not the answer to cost and productivity control and/or objectives.</p>
<p>RIM must, if it is to survive, first and foremost abandon the &#8220;live to work&#8221; philosophy, but then as you say it must also find a way to differentiate itself in the same ubiquitous space which is now dominated by a growing Apple and Android. As a colleague pointed out to me via email following my blog post &#8220;&#8230;when I see my kid’s grade 6 pals with iPhones, you know BB’s goose is cooked.&#8221; </p>
<p>The technology industry is cruel. Unlike politics where no matter how serious the faux-pas all can be forgiven, in the technology industry it is increasingly the case that after strike-one you&#8217;re out! We have Nortel, among others, to thank for that. </p>
<p>RIM&#8217;s current number one asset is the degree of customer loyalty they enjoy from BB users. Job 1 for RIM is to protect that asset and by my calculation it only has between 3-6 months at most to prove in a demonstrable way that it is committed and succeeding in doing so. If it fails at even this primary task, then like my colleague said its goose will be cooked before the US Thanks Giving &#8230; a month after iPhone 5 will be out, and I am willing to bet, within ear-shot of an iPad 3 announcement. That, my friend, is a damn tough act to compete against!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on What happened to RIM by Doug</title>
		<link>http://www.danbaril.com/2011/06/22/what-happened-to-rim/comment-page-1/#comment-1276</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2011 13:20:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.danbaril.com/?p=1544#comment-1276</guid>
		<description>Interesting! If you were managing or responsible for the cost and productivity of a group of employees what would you issue to them? Blackberry cannot compete with Apple or Android by appealing to the personal use market. They should concentrate on marketing to the business owner and manager trying to control the activities of an independent workforce with multiple modern distractions. They should differentiate not copy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting! If you were managing or responsible for the cost and productivity of a group of employees what would you issue to them? Blackberry cannot compete with Apple or Android by appealing to the personal use market. They should concentrate on marketing to the business owner and manager trying to control the activities of an independent workforce with multiple modern distractions. They should differentiate not copy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

